[hydes] Akira v2 [BDRip 1920x1030 x264 FLAC][Dual-Audio] (Scoped version) :: Nyaa ISS

[hydes] Akira v2 [BDRip 1920x1030 x264 FLAC][Dual-Audio] (Scoped version)

Category:
Date:
2022-07-05 00:11 UTC
Submitter:
Seeders:
19
Information:
Leechers:
3
File size:
51.6 GiB
Completed:
492
Info hash:
ad732e8954f6b449b7ee0f7ae4d86c0d0f6af326
![](https://bit.ly/39ddq9F) ___ #### Big thanks to: * **ghsushsu123**: planning help, various subtitle help, and the video comparisons * **WPR**: providing the JP LD track and the JP 2009 Hypersonic remix #### [Discord](https://discord.gg/PMrccmpYTu) #### See also the [other version](/view/1548873) of this v2 with D-Z0N3's encode! ___ ### Akira v2 (Scoped version) ### Video The video track in this version of the v2 is Scoped's more experimental encode of the Dynit IT BD, with which he attempted to emulate how a more proper scan of the original camera negative would look. You can read about his process [here](/view/1406204). See the screenshots linked down below in the "Comparisons" section to get a feel for how the encode compares to the remux and D-Z0N3's v2 encode. ### Audio The big "star track" of this v2 is definitely the original Japanese 2.0 Dolby Surround remix that WPR provided from his capture of the 1988 JP LaserDisc. I originally synced this track for Scoped's v2, but since that project has been put on hold indefinitely, I decided to include it here and make it public instead of continuing to let it sit on the PC. What makes the track special is the exceptionally thunderous bass on it. We're talking [movie theater levels of low-end](https://slow.pics/c/4mzz8Dyy) in the 20-100 Hz range. It's supposed to be a near-field, home video remix, yet for some reason, its mastering is more like what you'd expect to hear on a theatrical mix meant for large-scale theater rooms. Playing this track loud on just a moderate system is already a pretty intense experience. I can imagine with a decent setup you'd tend to feel the low bass notes, big explosions, copters rumbling, etc. And as far as I know, the LD(s?) is the only release to have this bass-heavy version of the track. The bass on the 2.0 tracks on the BDs has been reduced considerably (6-10 dB), causing them to sound a lot more subdued or even anemic in actiony scenes with heavier music or any type of bassy effects that reach below 100 Hz. On top of the 2.0 LD remix, included are all the usual tracks: * Japanese 5.1 2001 DVD remix from the 2019 IT BD * Japanese 5.1 2009 Hypersonic remix from the 2011 UK BD, which is a clone of the 2009 JP BD (downsampled from 192 kHz 24-bit to 48 kHz 16-bit simply to cut down on the massive 12 Gb file size) * English 2.0 (Streamline) dub from the 1992 US LD ([synced by scav](/view/1320871)) * English 5.1 (Animaze) dub from the 2013 US BD (downsampled from 96 kHz 24-bit to 48 kHz 16-bit due to being fake 24-bit and [cutting off](https://i.imgur.com/SgB4Juc.png) at ~23.2 kHz) In addition to its infamous revisionism, the 2009 Hypersonic remix is noticeably louder than the 2001 DVD remix and appears to clip slightly at points in channels 1-3. It does, however, seem to have less top-end noise reduction, so it at least possibly has some positive things about it (though it is unclear how much of that is simply EQ adjustment, as I don't hear much new detail or improved clarity. Someone with better hearing will have to verify). As for why the 4K BD 2020 Hypersonic remix isn't included, WPR really laid it out perfectly in his summary below. It is downright horrendous. It sounds to me like it's been heavily noise managed and then goosed with EQ, just awful all around. The spectrograms and mastering comparisons could be misleading in this case since they show a good amount of energy in the top-end on it, which, in reality, is all no doubt due to a significant 10-15 dB treble boost and not due to the track having any less NR. The 2001 DVD remixes on the UK/JP BD and 4K JP BD are the same as the IT BD track but lossy, so not really worth examining. Both English dubs are based on the original Dolby Surround remix, except for some redone SFX on the Animaze dub. ### Subtitles The subtitles are US BD subtitles styled and fully retimed by me, with [these two lines](https://i.imgur.com/ETEN6Lj.png) edited by the [SoM](https://twitter.com/seedofmight) guys. I checked out THORA’s subtitles, and while their timing wasn’t bad, I felt there were some things they definitely could've done better. My main gripes were that they had left short, mildly infuriating gaps between many lines and hadn't snapped lines to keyframes in places where I'd really prefer them snapped. These newly timed subtitles should hopefully present a bit better. Along with the overall timing refinements, I found it necessary to create and time a new track specifically for the 2.0 LD remix because the timing of the dialogue between the 2.0 and 5.1 mixes varies sectionally by up to 230 ms. I haven’t seen anyone do mix-specific subtitles for Akira before, so this should hopefully be a nice addition. (THORA’s and Niizk’s (Afro also uses Niizk) subtitles only match the 2009 Hypersonic remix, which varies timing-wise not only from the 2.0 mix but from the 2001 remix as well, hence why I’d only recommend using those subtitles if the Hypersonic remix is your track of choice.) Let me know of any errors and I’ll get to them when I can! ### A brief history of Akira in the Digital Era written by WPR: Akira has been one of the most re-released anime films of all time, with several editions, and tons of audio mixes in both its original Japanese, and with many languages having received multiple dubs. Released theatrically in Japan in 1988, it wasn’t the animation masterpiece we know today. Around 200 visual fixes were produced for the Japanese Laserdisc released later that year, with the audio being fully remixed as well. Among said changes were the end credits; originally in Japanese, they were completely remade from scratch but now in English. This updated Laserdisc release is what we know and love, having been overseen by director Katsuhiro Otomo. The theatrical version has never been released on home video ever. Despite the numerous releases, however, in the digital age, Akira has only been restored twice*. Once by IVC in Chicago using a newly made interpositive struck from the original camera negative by Bandai in Japan. The IP was scanned on a Spirit Datacine (the most common scanner of the era), and was restored using both automated and manual cleanup. Said restoration and simultaneously produced new English dub were examined and approved by THX. And secondly by Q-Tec in Japan, also using a newly made interpositive struck from the original camera negative, scanned at 16-bit HDR from a Lasergraphics 6.5K scanner, and restored using Q-Tec’s own FORS Master Process. It’s a tale of two restorations; One, a respectable, but dated remaster with pure intentions to deliver the definitive presentation possible in said era, let down mostly by technological restraints… and the other, a disastrous restoration utilizing a superb scan (still of an IP, as Bandai are too scared to use negatives), only to be mutilated by destructive filtering to the filmic integrity of the source, resulting in a less detailed and refined presentation, with only a solid HDR pass as its saving grace (despite its colour grading being radically different and less accurate to original animation cels). As such, the 2001 restoration by IVC and THX is still the best source of the film to date, with the most recent Italian Blu-ray by esteemed distributor Dynit as the best encoded version of it on disc. With regards to audio in Japanese, said original theatrical audio mix has never been released, and as such, the Laserdisc Dolby Surround track should be considered the “original” standard mix. Alongside the 2001 restoration, a new Japanese 5.1 remix was produced, staying mostly faithful to the sound design and mixing of the ‘88 LD track. However, fundamental changes begin here which persist in every subsequent remix. In 2009, when Bandai Visual released Akira on Blu-ray for the first time, one of the major selling points was a brand new remix utilizing the full bandwidth of the Dolby TrueHD codec in lossless 5.1 surround, 192kHz at full 24-bit. Simply put, the 2009 Hypersonic mix is an absolute beast of a track, featuring absolute reference quality clarity and fidelity, resulting in one of the best sounding audio tracks to any film ever made on a technical level. With regards to the mixing, while masterful in its own right, it is far removed from the ‘88 LD track, with many changes both logical and illogical, producing a track both highly respected and criticized for its revisionist nature. Still, it deserves to be heard by any and all audiophiles with a caveat regarding faithfulness to the source material. And lastly, for its 4K UHD Blu-ray release, a second Hypersonic track was produced, with a number of changes from its 2009 cousin, but with very few positives. Major noise reduction has been applied to the mix, resulting in less clear dialogue and distorted effects, and even more questionable mixing changes. Sound effects have been boosted to compensate for the severe NR, and audio levels are nowhere near as refined as the 2009 track, where an intricate balance of intensely crafted action and quieter, yet immersive sound mixing has been traded for a sonic whiplash of brash and distorted action with moments so filtered it’s hard to even hear the tiny background effects in less intense moments. Due to such sonic stupidity, the 4K hypersonic track has not been included. As such, my personal suggestion is to watch the film with the 2.0 Dolby Surround track, as it is a faithful representation of how the film was intended to be heard on home video. If you demand discreet and not matrixed surround sound, the 2001 5.1 mix is a good alternative. Finally, the 2009 hypersonic mix is a must listen, but as an alternative track due to its many changes in the core design and elements at play. *Bandai Visual claimed their 2009 Blu-ray featured a brand new restoration, however, when compared to the 2001 restoration, it appears the general qualities are very similar, if not nearly identical. ### Comparisons |[Japanese 2.0](https://slow.pics/c/XKbIw842)|[Japanese 5.1 (2001 / 2009 / 2020)](https://slow.pics/c/tMCcXCBS)|[IT BD / D-Z0N3 / Scoped](https://slow.pics/c/tQLZwtkQ)| |:-:|:-:|:-:| ### Specifics ↓

File list

  • [hydes] Akira (BDRip 1920x1030 x264 FLAC) (Scoped).mkv (51.6 GiB)

hydes (uploader)

User
### Specifics Video: 1. Scoped encode of the IT BD (1920x1030, 23.976 fps) Audio: 1. Japanese 2.0 Dolby Surround remix FLAC (1988 JP LD) [WPR] (default) 2. Japanese 5.1 2001 DVD remix FLAC (2019 IT BD) 3. Japanese 5.1 2009 Hypersonic remix FLAC (2011 UK BD) [WPR] 4. English 2.0 FLAC (1992 US LD) (Streamline) [shonenbat / scav] 5. English 5.1 FLAC (2013 US BD) (Animaze) Subtitles: 1. Signs Only [hydes] 2. English (2.0 timing) [hydes] (default) 3. English (2001 5.1 timing) [hydes] 4. English (2009 5.1 timing) [THORA] [MediaInfo](https://pastebin.com/raw/xiJJkxHQ) ![](https://i.imgur.com/BW20jff.png) ### Other things I couldn't fit into the description * For the sake of documentation, screenshots of the [English 5.1 (Animaze)](https://slow.pics/c/qlKG3FQ4) and [English 2.0 (Streamline)](https://slow.pics/c/N8RC5rGW) dubs. * The 2020 Hypersonic remix was also downsampled to 48 kHz to make the comparisons read better. For screenshots of the Hypersonic tracks in their original states, see [here](https://slow.pics/c/L5Ts2Blg). * Just for fun and to demonstrate the absurdity of the 2020 Hypersonic remix a bit, [a level-matched waveform comparison of the "sss" sounds in one of Kei's lines.](https://i.imgur.com/Rsgl8r6.png) On the 2020 Hypersonic remix, the first two sounds are ~13 dB louder, and the third one on the right is louder by ~6 dB. That's that huge treble boost in action. * [DDL](https://drive.google.com/file/d/1HnY2bmMR5iob4wEpRrQSvPCUsxrf_iZA/view?usp=sharing) for the original, 192 kHz 24-bit TrueHD version of the Japanese 5.1 2009 Hypersonic remix from the 2011 UK BD that WPR provided. * [Quite the comprehensive list](https://i.imgur.com/52IYo12.png) by [NLScavenger](https://twitter.com/NLScavenger) of the music changes between the Japanese mixes. * [Info on the 1988 JP LD](https://www.lddb.com/laserdisc/00157/SF070-1550/Akira) * [Info on the 1992 US LD](https://www.lddb.com/laserdisc/09372/CC1294L/Akira:-Special-Edition)
very based. i prefer the video of your other v2 to this one due to the fake grain here being a bit much for me but this is still awesome.
![](https://preview.redd.it/gg7u36anb2a51.jpg?width=640&crop=smart&auto=webp&s=9794099fd237940c2df55d119a9b284926626179)

hydes (uploader)

User
@PeePeePooPoo69 Yeah this is definitely a neat alternative to have as long as the file size isn't an issue. @friendevil22 💖
really making anidb's life impossible here lmao incredibly cool, though.
its ok if anime db wants to be a fail its its choice
The encode is better and already based on the ITBD. Why upload either of these? The encode is a duplicate too. Lulu has already done this.
Dangerously based. Always liked Scoped's work, despite all the complainers. Maybe someday we'll get a proper scan one day, tho...
Amazing work, thank you
@weebname for the audio options my dude

hydes (uploader)

User
@HachiRokuNiSanKyu And to add to what PeePeePooPoo69 said, I also like to think that the retimed subtitles are an improvement over the THORA subtitles Lulu has in their upload since THORA's only match the 2009 Hypersonic remix and could do with some retiming anyway in my opinion. @theAeon, guysome11, Gnome Thank you for the nice comments!
timing isn't an important part of the fansubbing process anyway
scoped looks fucking phenomenal. judgement gits tier encode
why this thing it's heavier than the bd, btw the fake grain look gross
Taking back my earlier comment. After seeing the comp I realized that this is much better than both the older encode and the Remux. This is definitely the best version. I have no idea why SeaDex chose the older encode instead.
Scoped looks amazing. It looks even more 4K than the actual 4K release.
I don't mind the fake grain that much, my only issue with this is that the highlights (especially eyes) look much darker compared to the IDBD release. Other than that this has unmached quality.